Stephen J. Mraz
Senior Editor
After starting an aerospace component-
manufacturing company in
1997, Keith Entz and his company
Entz Aerodyne, Valley Center,
Kans., got caught up in one of the
aerospace industry’s downturns.
So around 2004 his partner David
Kirkwood and Production Manager
Matt Cochran started looking
for another line of business. “We
wanted to branch out to another
market that wasn’t so cyclical and
where we could be an OEM instead
of a contractor,” says Cochran.
After some discussion, the three
men decided to take advantage of
two facts: the aging Baby Boom
generation would soon be needing
a vast array of medical devices,
including wheelchairs. And David
Kirkwood, the firms’ vice president
and an engineer, had extensive,
first-hand experience with wheelchairs,
having survived an attack of
bacterial meningitis that left him a
triple amputee.
“Wheelchairs had been made pretty much the same way for the
past 50 years, like patio furniture
with bent and welded tubing and
fabric,” says Cochran. “We thought
wheelchairs were screaming for
new technology. So we applied the
same technology to wheelchair
design that we had learned while
building aircraft parts.”
The result? A new company,
Aero Innovative Research Inc.
(AIR) and the development of a
strong, lightweight chair that is durable
and comfortable. And when
folded up, it measures only 9.5-in.
wide, making it the tightest-folding
wheelchair on the market.
Starting from scratch
The goals of the AIR’s design
were strength and light weight, especially
on the wheelchair components
they would be manufacturing,
including frame panels, caster
fork, rear-axle plate, and folding
foot plate. Other parts, such as
the standard wheels, hand rims, and hubs, they decided to purchase
from suppliers. But whether
parts were made or outsourced,
they also needed to have a built-in
safety factor.
The team modeled and analyzed
every part that would go into their
Flight Ultralight wheelchair using
Alibre Design, a CAD package,
and DesignCheck, FEA software
from Algor.
“Every part went through many
design iterations,” says Cochran.
“We analyzed 20 different versions
of some parts, seeing where material
was stressed, where we could
remove material or add it. Basically
we fine-tuned every part. It was laborious,
but the software let us do
it quickly.”
The caster flange, for example,
was created and modeled in Alibre
and then analyzed for linear stress,
the only type of analysis this design
project required. They subjected
the flange to a 1,620-lb load to simulate
the chair with a 250-lb occupant falling 3 ft onto one wheel. “It’s
a load we wouldn’t expect a competitor’s
tube chair to survive,” says
Cochran, referring to the bent-tube
construction commonly used on
other chairs. “We tested the caster
at this load as a way of overdesigning
it, to ensure it could take the
abuse, and to boost our confidence
in its durability.”
FEA results showed stress concentrations
on the flange, which
suggested a design revision. “We
added a fin to better distribute the
load, and we ended up with a part
that was stronger and also about
15% lighter than our first effort.”
FEA also helped the design
team overcome the dreaded wiggling
wheel, a problem well known
to almost anyone who has pushed
a grocery cart. “The front wheels
mounted in casters on wheelchairs, like
those on grocery cars, can flutter
and turn sideways once they go
above a certain speed,” says Cochran.
“Simply adding a Delrin bushing,
which acts as a damper, prevents the
wheels from fluttering.”
Analysis also suggested they
beef up the caster’s bearings if they
wanted a really durable chair. “Most
other chairs rely on plain bearings
that can withstand about 300 lb of
radial load. We use combination
needle-roller bearings rated for
2,000 lb of radial load and 6,000 lb
of axial load, and equipped it with
a single-point grease fitting. Such
fittings are common on aerospace
components and make the bearings
easy to lube. So the bearing
should last the life of the chair.”
In the medical industry, wheelchair
life is somewhat artificially
set at between three and five years because that is how often thirdparty
payers such as Medicare and
private insurance companies will
pay for a new chair. People usually
hold on to the older chair and use it
as a back up if it is not too worn.
AIR also designed their chair to
fold up, but unlike other collapsible
chairs with fabric-based sling
seats, the Flight chair has a solid
seat. Sling seats, like a hammock,
are suspended from two sides and
dip in a slight arc.
“Seats in traditional wheelchairs
eventually sag, limiting internal rotation
and abduction of the hips,
plus they increase the weight put
on bony prominences (in the pelvis),”
says Dr. Kathy Lewis a professor
of physical therapy at Wichita
State University. “The resulting
poor posture, increased risk of
contracture (permanent shortening
of muscles and tendons) and
skin breakdowns (bed sores) increase
health-care costs and decrease (patient) function. These
problems are not an issue with a
sold-seat design.”
The standard Flight seat is rigid
and lets occupants sit up straight,
preventing their hips from rotating.
People with sling seats can
get the advantages of a hard,
straight seat by placing a lightweight
carbon-fiber plate on their
wheelchairs, but such inserts can
cost up to $500. “And though a
flat, rigid seat sounds uncomfortable,
all chairs are used with some
kind of cushion, and that can be
anything from a 2-in.-thick air
bladder to a 4-in.-thick air and
foam combination,” says Cochran.
“The Flight chair is quite
comfortable, but you might have
to sit in it to believe it.”
The flat seat has another advantage.
If a person falls out of
the chair, the rigid seat gives them
something to grab hold of and lift
themselves up onto. Sling seats, on
the other hand, move side to side
and don’t feel stable.
Wheel locks on the Flight chair
are also somewhat different, especially
in the way they mount
to the chair. In traditional chairs,
the locks, one per side, are held
on by a double-tube clamp gripping
a round tube. “Eventually,
such clamps loosen or the lock
components loosen,” says Cochran.
“Our locks mount to a flat
panel, so they stay put. We can also
mount the locks in a lower position
down closer to the casters,
again by firmly attaching them to
a flat panel. This lets more athletic
people use a longer stroke in turning
the rear wheels without running
their hands or thumbs into
the locking mechanism,”
Finally, the Flight chair folds
into a compact, easily transportable
package with a one-hand motion
on the seat handle. There are
no latches, and the spring-loaded
footplate automatically folds out of
the way. Other chairs take a least a
second step to fold away the footplates.
And there are no locks that
keep the Flight chair open. “Our
chair relies on its box structure to give it rigidity and keep it from
folding.”
After a year and half of design
work, which included building
nine prototypes, the chair endured
four months of FDA-required
testing. One of the more
rigorous tests involves a doubledrum
device. Technicians strap a
weighted dummy into the chair
then run it on two double-drum
rollers, one for each wheel. But
each drum has a thick strap
around it that runs perpendicular
to the chair’s wheels. So as
the drums spin, which make the
chairs wheels turn, the chair is
subject to a jarring impact each
time it rolls over the strap. The
test lasts for 200,000 cycles or
impacts and is meant to simulate
three years of wear. The Flight
chair passed all its FDA testing,
including the double-drum test,
on its first try and without a single
fastener coming loose. In fact,
Kirkwood uses the chair that survived
the life-cycle tests. “And it
still performs like new,” he says.
Aerospace techniques
When it comes to choice of materials
and assembly techniques,
AIR’s aerospace heritage shines
through. The frame is CNC machined
out of aircraft-grade aluminum
that is bonded and riveted
together. And the rivets are
wet shot, meaning they are coated
with epoxy when they are installed.
“Because we don’t weld, which
calls for softer metals, we can use
stronger alloys with twice the tensile
strength to make smaller and
lighter parts,” says Cochran.
Most traditional chairs have
bent and hand-welded hollow-tube
frames made of 6000 Series aluminum
alloys. “When those chairs
come out of the jig, the welds cool
and warp,” notes Cochran. “Welds
are also inconsistent and manufacturers
never know exactly what’s
in the weld or how the heat used
in welding changed the material
properties of the aluminum. And
hollow tubing eventually bends,
kinks, and possibly breaks.”
With a solid, damage-tolerant frame
that will take abuse, AIR
then adds precision-machined
components such as sandwich
panels and gun-drilled hinges.
The aluminum sheet metal for the
panels gets CNC machined and
are then bonded to a solid core
of high-density foam with aircraft-
grade epoxy. Each panel has
threaded inserts that go though
both skins to create a solid member
through the panel wherever
there is a fastening point. Companies
making conventional
chairs add components to a tube
frame with clamps or by drilling
holes through the hollow tubing.
“And every time they drill a hole
through the frame, they are making
the chair weaker,” says Cochran.
“Whereas every time we
add a fastening point to our chair,
we make the chair stronger.”
The hinges are machined from
a solid piece of aluminum with a
1/8-in. hole drilled through all of the knuckles. “It’s not a rolled hinge in
which metal is rolled over to form
a tube. Our hinge is smaller and
stronger, which helps save weight
and makes the chair more reliable,“
Cochran says.
In keeping with aircraft standards,
AIR holds many of its parts
to 0.001-in. tolerances. Is that
overkill on a wheelchair? “We don’t
think so,” says Cochran. “It’s all
about building a quality product,
and it gives us several advantages.”
For example, the frame is precise,
with squared, parallel sides.
This means the rear wheels will
be well aligned and stay that way.
“Every 1.5° of misalignment between
the rear wheels doubles rolling
resistance,” says Cochran. “So
our chairs roll easier, which translates
into less shoulder fatigue, and
over time, users will appreciate that
fact.”
“The machined frame also
means users can add, change, or replace components because all parts
are made to the same demanding
specs,” says Cochran. So if a young
user grows or an older one loses
weight, they can purchase individual
parts to modify their chair,
confident the new parts will fit and
function as well as the original.
They aren’t forced to buy entirely
new chairs.”
Currently, AIR has 12 employees
making about 80 chairs/month
and the goal is to work up to about
1,000 chairs/year. The design
team, meanwhile is working on
using FEA and simulation software
from Algor to improve their
chair and to develop accessories
that could be used on wheelchairs
from competitors.
Make Contact
Aero Innovative Research Inc.,
airwheelchair.com
Algor Inc., algor.com
Alibre Inc., alibre.com