Developing a Data Strategy
The 6 Phases of Force Sensor Integration
Going Where No Valve Has Gone Before
Expanding the IoT Vocabulary

Distributed Wind Power on the Rise
The U.S. Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory has issued its annual report on distributed wind capacity, revealing that large installations of distributed wind power almost doubled in 2017.
Distributed wind power is localized, so the power is generated near where it will be used rather than originating in remote commercial wind farms and getting sent to load centers over long transmission lines. Distributed wind farms generate power for homes, farms, businesses, and other locations where the power is typically consumed onsite, or on the local distribution system to meet energy demands. Facilities can range from a 5-kW turbine powering a home to a few multi-megawatt turbines sending electricity to several industrial sites on the same distribution system.
In 2017, the trend toward larger turbines in distributed installations continued. The number of installed turbines that generate 100 kW or more nearly doubled compared with 2016. These installations represent a $262 million investment in 2017, according to the report.

This 1.7-kW Pika Energy T701 wind turbine is located at a home in Maine. (Credit: Pieter Huebner/Off-Grid Enterprises)
There are more than 81,000 wind turbines used in distributed applications across the U.S. and its territories, totaling more than 1,000 MW of distributed wind capacity.
“Although smaller turbines still account for the most units sold, this is the third year in a row that the installed capacity of larger installations has risen,” says Alice Orrell, who led the PNNL study. Whether used by factories, commercial businesses, or even utilities, this wind power production offsets pressure on local electrical grids, and the market seems to appreciate this benefit.”
The report found that 78% of the installed distributed wind capacity documented for 2017 serves utility loads on local distribution grids.
The report also tracks distributed wind power state-by-state. Twenty-one states added a total of 83.7 MW of new distributed wind capacity in 2017, representing 3,311 wind turbines totaling $274 million in investment. Iowa ranked first in distributed wind capacity installed in 2017 with 63.5 MW and, now with a total of 192.7 MW, leads the nation in cumulative distributed wind capacity.

Here is the U.S. distributed wind capacity, by state, for 2003 through 2017.
“In general, it was a good year for distributed wind power,” says PNNL’s Nik Foster, who was part of the research team. “While exports of U.S.-made wind turbines decreased from 10.3 MW in 2016 to 5.5 MW in 2017, investments in the U.S. rose by $111 million, the number of installed units grew by 28%, and another turbine was certified, showing confidence in the technology.”
Now in its sixth year, the Distributed Wind Market Report was funded by DOE’s Wind Energy Technologies Office to help the distributed wind community—utilities, manufacturers, and federal and state agencies—keep an eye on current market conditions and regulatory environments. It provides the wind power community with a year-to-year comparison to measure growth and trends, as well as data such as costs, number of deployments, performance and capacity factors, types of turbines used, customer type, domestic and international markets, and market drivers and barriers.

Moment of Opportunity: Additive Manufacturing’s Scalability and Industrialization
Additive manufacturing (AM) has experienced a new surge of interest as a manufacturing tool following its role in efforts to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. When supplies of critical equipment were limited, hospitals, businesses and other organizations turned to the 3D printing community for its rapid product development and localized production benefits to fill gaps and create new innovations to reduce the pandemic’s spread and, in some cases, develop new medical devices as alternative treatments.
However, after this initial time of great demand, traditional manufacturers began stepping in to fill the ongoing need for mass production of medical and preventative equipment. As we look to the future of 3D printing, our community must ask ourselves two questions:
- Did 3D printing truly reach its potential during the initial wave of the coronavirus pandemic?
- Can 3D printing fill the role that other manufacturing techniques have traditionally played in the past for mass production?
Unlocking AM’s Full Potential
While our industry’s efforts during this crisis did take advantage of two of the key benefits of 3D printing, the full potential for the technology has yet to be seen. The key to this will lie in the industrialization of 3D printing through its ability to not only produce existing parts in a rapid, local manner, but to offer improvements on existing designs in terms of light-weighting, strength and customization over their traditionally manufactured predecessors. This is achieved by engineers and designers developing parts specifically intended for additive manufacturing.
Time constraints due to immediate demand during the height of the pandemic did not allow engineers to fully consider and design parts with specific additive benefits in mind. However, as we look to the future, these events have helped increase awareness of 3D printing’s benefits and have sparked interest in the technology. We now have an excellent opportunity to expand 3D printing adoption and showcase the value it can bring to manufacturers across industries.
Jurgen Laudus
AM’s Role in Mass Production
There will always be parts and production lines where traditional manufacturing provides the best, most effective method. However, in cases where not only mass production is desired, but also mass customization, additive manufacturing can provide a unique advantage. The keys to driving this technology forward are industrialization, scalability and ensuring we continue to move forward in a sustainable manner.
Collaboration with customers, partners and within our own industry is the first step toward industrialization. With customers and partners, this will come through analysis and discussion of the types of products that are the best candidates to truly benefit from 3D printing’s advantages.
Standardization & Industrialization
Materialise’s Mindware consultation services allows for the collaboration with companies interested in 3D printing to develop a plan that best fits their strategic objectives. This can be an educational process to help those less familiar with the unique considerations required for 3D printing to identify the applications where 3D printing can add value, as well as the technology and processes that best fit their needs. This educational, collaborative method is one way that we are working to help move our industry closer to industrialization.
Within the 3D printing community, another step toward effective industrialization will be to standardize machine languages to allow software and hardware to interact more efficiently. This is one answer to our industry’s ongoing question of “how can we do this better?” Each OEM currently has its own machine language, so in order to reveal real-time printer data, we need to translate that language into one we can easily understand.
With industry standardization and a common language for 3D printing, this step would be eliminated, allowing for increased efficiency and scalability in additive manufacturing operations. This feature is especially valuable in more complex production lines where multiple printers, software developers and designers are working together to create the best possible product.
A shift to a standard machine language would enable a range of benefits, including bridging the gap between software and hardware, improved efficiency through common workflows, enhanced machine monitoring and improved quality of build parameters. This is not an initiative that any single company can complete on its own, and will require collaboration between industry leaders to make a real impact.
As we navigate these steps, our industry is at an exciting point in its slow revolution where we have an opportunity to achieve more rapid adoption and industrialization. This is especially relevant as companies seek localized solutions to potential vulnerabilities in their global supply chains. Additive manufacturing has proven that it can be an effective, efficient and valuable tool.
Our challenge now is to grasp this opportunity, work with our industry and manufacturing partners and help 3D printing reach its full potential.
Jurgen Laudus is vice president of Materialise Manufacturing.




