Sensor Sense: Avoid collision damage with long-range sensors

March 9, 2006
Inductive proximity sensors typically mount so the objects they detect approach within 40 to 80% of the sensor target range.

— Robert Repas, Associate Editor

Extended-range proximity sensors provide up to 3x the distance in sensing range over standard sensors. The longer distance reduces the possibility of collision damage by mounting the sensor further away from the moving target.


This range usually allows for all accumulated manufacturing and application tolerances. The sensing distances for standard cylindrical-type inductive sensors range from 0.8 to 15 mm. Thus, actual separation between the sensor and target is typically less than 12 mm — often significantly less.

Sensors positioned close to their moving targets are far more likely to suffer damage from physical contact. With machinery and equipment becoming increasingly compact, there isn't always room for additional mounting brackets or assemblies to properly hold sensors in position. A sensor that shifts or vibrates in position is more prone to collision damage. In this instance, many users prefer to use "extended-range" sensors to reduce the possibility of damage.

Extended-range sensors offer up to three times the range of standard inductive proximity sensors for the same-size housing. The longer sensing range reduces the likelihood of target-to-sensor collisions simply because the sensor mounts farther away from the moving target. Engineered for flexibility, extended-range sensors come in virtually all industry-standard housings and operating styles.

Extended-range sensors also help if the target is a nonferrous material such as aluminum or brass. When the correction factor for nonferrous metals is applied to extended-range sensors, the sensor ends up spaced almost a "normal" distance away from the target.

Pepperl+Fuchs (am.pepperlfuchs.com) provided information for this column.

About the Author

Robert Repas

Robert serves as Associate Editor - 6 years of service. B.S. Electrical Engineering, Cleveland State University.

Work experience: 18 years teaching electronics, industrial controls, and instrumentation systems at the Nord Advanced Technologies Center, Lorain County Community College. 5 years designing control systems for industrial and agricultural equipment. Primary editor for electrical and motion control.

Sponsored Recommendations

Food Production: How SEW-EURODRIVE Drives Excellence

Feb. 18, 2025
Optimize food production with SEW-EURODRIVE’s hygienic, energy-efficient automation and drive solutions for precision, reliability, and sustainability.

Optimizing Agricultural Operations with SEW-EURODRIVE

Feb. 18, 2025
Boost efficiency with SEW-EURODRIVE's durable drive solutions for agriculture. Reliable, efficient, and tailored for you!

Ensure Safety with Explosion-Proof Pumps for Critical Applications

Feb. 10, 2025
For high-risk environments, reliability is paramount. Learn how KNF's explosion-proof pumps provide enhanced safety and performance in demanding OEM and process applications, ...

Revolutionizing Pump Efficiency with Advanced Drive Technology

Feb. 10, 2025
Discover how KNF’s innovative MI Motors are transforming pump intelligence and system integration. With enhanced efficiency and smarter control, this breakthrough technology optimizes...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!