ICBM Killers One Step Closer to Reality

Feb. 21, 2008
Engineers at Northrop Grumman successfully test-fired the Stage 1 solid-rocket engine for the Kinetic Energy Interceptor, a missile designed to seek out and destroy ICBMs.

The latest test, the third in a fivetest series, evaluated the engine at elevated firing temperatures, and a new hybrid throat nozzle. The Stage 2 solid-rocket motor concept will undergo four tests. Both stages should fly this year in a flight test of the booster system.

When finished, the booster rockets will accelerate the missile, which measures about 12-m high and 1-meter wide, to about 6 km/sec, all the while adjusting its trajectory to bring it nearer the ICBM. The missile will use ground-based telemetry from a mobile-launch system. (The launch system, including rockets and launchers, fits in a C-17 transport aircraft.) The rocket then ejects the Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle, which homes in on the ICBM using an IR seeker and rams into it, using kinetic energy, not explosives, to destroy the missile.

When completed, which will likely take five to eight years or more, a battery of 10 missiles based in Italy should protect all of Western Europe against Middle East missile attacks. Similarly, a battery in Norfolk, Va., could protect the East coast of the U.S. from launches 300 to 15,000 km off the coast.

Other companies involved in the development include Raytheon, which is building the Kill Vehicle, and ATK, Orbital Sciences, Honeywell, Aerojet, Ball Aerospace, and Kuchera.

The first-stage rocket engine for the kinetic Energy Interceptor was recently test fired, the fourth test in 18 months.

 

The mobile KEI system can be moved by a military truck like this one. The entire system fits inside a C-17 transport aircraft.

 

Sponsored Recommendations

7 Reasons Why Air Bearings Outperform Mechanical Bearings

Feb. 7, 2025
Frictionless air bearings and air bearing stages have decisive advantages in precision motion and automation applications.

Hexapod Robot Applications in Automation and Automotive Assembly

Feb. 7, 2025
Hexapod 6-DOF Robots in Automation and Automotive Assembly | 6-Axis Precision Parallel Robot | Cobot for High Precision Applications

What is a Difference between a Gantry Positioning System and a Split-Bridge?

Feb. 7, 2025
The design of a Gantry Positioning System and Split-Bridge Positioning system are related. Learn how they differ and what to use best for your application.

Application Solutions with 6-Axis Hexapod Positioning Systems

Feb. 7, 2025
Explore applications, articles, and background information on 6-Axis Hexapod Positioning Systems and how they can help you improve your alignment system.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!