Machinedesign 2073 Profit And Lost 0 0

Fun with Fundamentals: Problem 188

Oct. 1, 2000
Profit and lost and Solution to Problem 187. It is not what you say, it is how you say it, as this problem by Ying Gong of Portland, Ore., demonstrates.

Profit and lost

Problem 188 — It’s not what you say, it’s how you say it, as this month’s problem by Ying Gong of Portland, Ore., demonstrates.

“... and it is now my pleasure to declare a company-wide bonus of $300 for each employee — less taxes and miscellaneous corporate overhead expenses,” intoned Horatio Puff, president of the venerable Lee Key Hydraulic Co. “The following disclosure statement shows the formula used to calculate the exact amount each employee will receive. It’s a new style of accounting called the Reciprocating Method, meaning from me to all of you and from all of you to me! Each employee will receive the reciprocal of the following amount:”

Reduce the above expression to its simplest terms. How much does each employee really get?

Solution to last month’s problem 187 — Your theories aren’t hollow, if you said the hollow shaft would work. It will carry 15/16 as much torque as the solid shaft. Here’s the core of the matter: Since allowable torque is related (directly) to the steel’s allowable shear stress and polar moment of inertia, you should compare their polar moments of inertia.

Let:
D = OD of hollow and solid shafts, given as 4 in.
d = ID of hollow shaft, given as 2 in.
l = Length of both shafts, given as 60 in.
p = Density of steel, given as 0.284 lb/in.3
JH = Polar moment of inertia for hollow shaft, lb-in.2
JS = Polar moment of inertia for solid shaft, lb-in.2

But d = D ÷ 2, therefore:

Divide JH by JS to get 15/16.

Now for the extra credit. Multiply the volume of each shaft by p:

Let:
VH = Volume of hollow shaft, in.3
VS = Volume of solid shaft, in.3
wH = Weight of hollow shaft, lb
wS = Weight of solid shaft, lb
wS= VS × πR2lp = 214.13 lb
wH = VH × p
= π(R2 - r2
) lp = 160.60 lb

The weight savings is 53.53 lb, and DePouff gets his trophy!

Contest winner — Congratulations to Scott Wootten of Mercerville, N.J., who won our August contest by having his name drawn from the 110 contestants who answered correctly out of a total of 129 entrants for that month. A TI-68 calculator is in the mail to him. A number of respondents assumed the shadows fell on opposite sides of the piller and answered 800 ft. These were also included in the drawing.

The TI-68 Advanced Scientific Calculator by Texas Instruments can solve five simultaneous equations with real and complex coefficients and has 40 number functions that can be used in both the rectangular and polar coordinate systems. Other functions include formula programming, integration, and polynomial root finding. The calculator also features a lastequation replay function that lets you doublecheck your work.

Sponsored Recommendations

How BASF turns data into savings

May 7, 2024
BASF continuously monitors the health of 63 substation assets — with Schneider’s Service Bureau and EcoStruxure™ Asset Advisor. ►Learn More: https://www.schn...

Agile design thinking: A key to operation-level digital transformation acceleration

May 7, 2024
Digital transformation, aided by agile design thinking, can reduce obstacles to change. Learn about 3 steps that can guide success.

Can new digital medium voltage circuit breakers help facilities reduce their carbon footprint?

May 7, 2024
Find out how facility managers can easily monitor energy usage to create a sustainable, decarbonized environment using digital MV circuit breakers.

The Digital Thread: End-to-End Data-Driven Manufacturing

May 1, 2024
Creating a Digital Thread by harnessing end-to-end manufacturing data is providing unprecedented opportunities to create efficiencies in the world of manufacturing.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!