Why Infrastructure, Not Just Robots, Will Define the Next Era of Intralogistics
Key Highlights
- Automated systems such as AGVs, AMRs and digital twins are transforming warehouse operations, but their success depends heavily on reliable charging infrastructure.
- Mixed fleets and interoperable ecosystems necessitate standardized communication protocols like VDA 5050 and ISO 21423 to ensure seamless system integration.
- Conductive charging offers high efficiency for high-throughput operations, while inductive (wireless) charging provides safety and flexibility for full automation environments.
Thanks to automated systems, from automated guided vehicles (AGVs) and automated mobile robots (AMRs) to automated retrieval and storage systems (AS/RS) and digital twins, warehouse operations are undergoing transformation. Yet facility infrastructure is struggling to keep up with demands of advanced automation systems.
AGV, AMRs and collaborative robots have significantly advanced automation in the manufacturing industry, but even the most advanced robot cannot move without reliable power. Charging infrastructure is an often-overlooked part of warehouse environments, but one that can significantly increase uptime, improve fleet utilization and extend robot battery life.
READ MORE: Robotics in 2026: Software-Led Machine Design, Practical AI & Market Demand
The value of a well-engineered charging strategy is more critical than ever as demand for automated systems continues to grow. In fact, one study points out that over 95% of manufacturing companies plan to introduce new automation within the next three years, creating strong demand for compatible automated charging systems.
AGV and AMR deployment in 2026 is accelerating, making robust charging architecture critical for consistent production and intralogistics support.
From Machines to Ecosystems
Facilities are shifting away from relying on isolated automated equipment and moving toward designing connected, interoperable ecosystems. These ecosystems include mixed fleets, which feature a variety of AGV/AMR solutions from different vendors. And the disparate automated solutions are expected to work together within a single environment.
While mixed fleets offer certain benefits, such as allowing OEMs and end-users to match the right machine with the right task and offering increased adaptability to changing demand, they also present a new set of challenges for charging. Redundant charging solutions and minimal coordination between vehicle types are two of the main challenges. These factors threaten interoperability, consistent production and ongoing communication between different solutions.
READ MORE: Festo Offers Components for Intralogistics Motion Automation
As the industry continues to rely on various automated solutions as part of an evolving ecosystem, it’s more important than ever for global communication and control standards to keep systems in check. VDA 5050 and ISO 21423 standards support standardized communication and guidelines for AGV/AMR fleets. They streamline communication interfaces and control architecture so that different systems can operate together within the same environment. They also help to align global expectations for interoperability, safety and performance.
Charging Drives Performance
Charging architecture is the hidden determinant of uptime, efficiency and ROI. It’s important to understand the type of infrastructure a particular facility requires. There are two main methods— inductive and conductive—and both meet different goals, but their use does not have to be siloed.
Conductive Charging
Conductive systems use physical contact between the charger and the vehicle to transfer power. These systems can achieve charge efficiencies of more than 95% and deliver high current levels. Conductive charging is an industry-preferred choice for high-throughput operations where vehicles do not have to charge for as long.
Inductive (Wireless) Charging
Inductive, also known as wireless, charging is more prevalent among facilities targeting full automation. Wireless charging systems transfer power through electromagnetic fields, which help to eliminate physical connectors and minimize wear. They can be slightly less efficient overall when compared to conductive charging, but modern systems offer key benefits when considering safety and flexibility.
When dealing with mixed fleets, different AGV/AMR systems will likely require different charging methods. It’s becoming more common for charging infrastructure to include hybrid deployments, with conductive docks providing fast charging during scheduled stops and embedded inductive pads allowing vehicles to top off opportunistically as they pass through work zones.
To get the most out of charging architecture, it’s important to track its performance. This makes sure fleets are operating at peak efficiency. Keeping track of metrics like system availability, charge cycle time, power throughput and energy efficiency can help identify patterns, prevent bottlenecks and optimize schedules. By doing this, charging infrastructure becomes a performance driver and a feedback loop when testing adjustments and forecasting needs.
Futureproofing Through Flexibility
Well-engineered infrastructure is key to a future-proof facility. Flexible, modular and safe systems that can evolve alongside fleets, standards and energy requirements are essential for preparing warehouses for what’s to come. With a variety of automated systems cohabitating in a singular facility, it’s more important than ever to lean into flexibility where it makes sense.
READ MORE: New Charging Technologies in Warehouse Automation
Interoperability is key to maximizing charging coordination, optimizing grid capacity and utilizing floor space more efficiently. By integrating modular charging solutions early in the design phase, facilities can support system compatibility while also shortening development cycles, reducing field-testing risks and enabling flexible energy options across product lines. But interoperability is sometimes viewed as an afterthought. When addressed too late in system planning, modularity becomes much harder to integrate. This leads to costly rework, operational downtime and limited scalability.
Redefining the Automation Conversation
In 2026, intralogistics will be defined by having the smartest, most comprehensive infrastructure connecting disparate systems and fleets. By understanding the evolving manufacturing ecosystem, recognizing the importance of charging infrastructure and leaning into future-proof solutions, facility managers can ensure their systems and facilities are prepared for more efficient, reliable operations.

