Opinion: Consider non-engineering software for some industrial-design tasks

Nov. 8, 2007
An old adage says just because you have a hammer doesn’t mean everything should look like a nail. That's certainly true for software.

An old adage says just because you have a hammer doesn’t mean everything should look like a nail.

In other words, it’s better to have the right tool for the job. Industrial design often requires tools that might not be included in an average engineer’s toolbox. The days of the drafting board are obviously all-but gone, replaced by the ever-present computer. While you can undoubtedly do useful work with Windows Paint, it is still wise to invest in more-capable and specialized software.

The most important is probably 3D modeling software. It lets you build 3D digital models of your concepts that you can rotate and really get to know. In fact, many 3D modelers lend themselves well to industrial design. Be sure to look for software that supports free-form surface modeling. This capability is important because more-traditional engineering software limits users in the kind of shapes they can build. Most such packages make it easier to define shapes first, and then combine them. This gives efficient volumes, but users are hard-pressed to get the smooth and exciting curves a surface modeler provides.

Before you start sending me angry or hurt e-mails over the last statement, I realize there are plenty of engineering modelers out there that do surface modeling.

However, I am discussing programs that are actually used successfully in the industrial-design community. Examples include AliasStudio, Rhino, Vellum — even SolidWorks, which is usually associated with MCAD. Each program has its strengths and weaknesses as well as a loyal user base.

It’s also a good idea to purchase graphical software. I prefer vector-based programs. Look for software that also has raster capability. Several widely used programs include Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Photoshop, CorelDraw, and Deneba’s Canvas. All are excellent. I like CorelDraw because it does most everything and at a fraction of the price of other programs.

Another good idea — ensure you have rapid-prototyping capability. Of course, you can hire outside firms for this. However, additive machines are increasingly affordable, so it might make sense to buy your own. There are several different technologies, but the idea is the same: build up parts, layer-bylayer, directly from 3D CAD models.

Edited by Leslie Gordon.

About the Author

Michael Hudspeth | Professional Member of the Industrial Designers Society of America

Mike Hudspeth is a consultant, lifelong artist, and avid model builder. He's worked as a senior designer for a global medical company and has more than two decades of experience.

Hudspeth has also been a Contributing Technical Expert to Machine Design magazine for more than eight years.

He lives in St. Louis, Mo.

Sponsored Recommendations

Customizations to Get Standard Motors to Mars

Jan. 10, 2025
Clearly, the Martian environment can be harsh and unaccommodating to systems made to operate on Earth. Through a combination of standard industrial motors and creative collaboration...

No Access for Bacteria: An Inside Look at Maxon's Cleanroom

Jan. 10, 2025
Tiny drive systems for use in the human body have to be built in a clean environment, free of microbiological contamination. Welcome to the GMP cleanroom of maxon, where discipline...

High-Efficiency, Precision Drive Systems for Every Robot

Jan. 10, 2025
Robots assemble devices, explore space, and perform surgeries. To achieve human-like motion and accuracy they need powerful and highly precise drives. Learn about custom-made ...

The Importance of Motors in Transportation

Jan. 10, 2025
As we progress toward more efficient and automated systems, the need for robust and reliable motors in the transportation industry has become more critical than ever. Explore ...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!