Too little training and the wrong tools led to dough-machine injury

April 5, 2011
A worker’s hand was injured when it got caught in a dough-cutting machine. Poor training, the wrong tools, and bad ergonomics contributed to the accident.

A bakery worker’s hand was injured in the piston of a dough cutter. The worker was cleaning stray dough from the walls of the machine’s hopper at the end of a batch. To do this, he had to reach over the rim of the hopper with a small scraper.

A portable three-step riser permitted access to the hopper from the back of the machine. However it was prone to being bumped by passing forklifts and didn’t provide a good angle for cleaning the hopper. From the top step, workers often climbed onto a flat portion on top of the machine and reached into the hopper.

The rim of the hopper was 14.5 in. above the platform. The moving piston of the cutter created a suction which pulled dough in to form loaves. The moving parts, located about 2 ft below the hopper rim, ran at 30 to 50 rpm.

The worker was standing on the platform, leaning in to scrape dough from the hopper, when his hand was pulled into the piston. He was able to free his hand and run for help, but not before he sustained an injury that kept him from returning to his job.

Investigators learned that machinery operators received on-the-job training from other operators for their assignments.

And although workers said “everyone knew” to turn off machines before cleaning them out, there was no record of the injured employee or anyone else having been instructed in safe maintenance practices.

In addition, the machine lacked clear warning labels indicating pinch points and other hazardous conditions. Investigators also couldn’t find a user manual and had to obtain one from the machine’s manufacturer for their report.

Finally, workers had altered the wiring to bypass some of the machine’s safety provisions. For example, an interlocked control-panel door kept falling off, so the interlock was defeated to let the machine continue running. This bypass also defeated the emergency-stop measure. Someone nearby ran to turn off the machine’s power supply after his coworker was injured.

Investigators recommended a more formal safety program including proper use of lockout/tagout and interlocks. They also suggested a taller hopper or longer scraper as ways to prevent future accidents.

This month’s safety violation comes from the files of Lanny Berke, a registered professional engineer and Certified Safety Professional involved in forensic engineering since 1972.  © 2011 Penton Media, Inc.

Sponsored Recommendations

Pumps Push the Boundaries of Low Temperature Technology

June 14, 2024
As an integral part of cryotechnology, KNF pumps facilitate scientific advances in cryostats, allowing them to push temperature boundaries and approach absolute zero.

The entire spectrum of drive technology

June 5, 2024
Read exciting stories about all aspects of maxon drive technology in our magazine.

MONITORING RELAYS — TYPES AND APPLICATIONS

May 15, 2024
Production equipment is expensive and needs to be protected against input abnormalities such as voltage, current, frequency, and phase to stay online and in operation for the ...

Solenoid Valve Mechanics: Understanding Force Balance Equations

May 13, 2024
When evaluating a solenoid valve for a particular application, it is important to ensure that the valve can both remain in state and transition between its de-energized and fully...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!