Advanced Manufacturing: When will that padlock break? Simulation tells all.

Sept. 10, 2010
Deform analysis software from Scientific Forming Technologies Corp. helped helped padlock manufacturer Hercules Industries, Prospect, Ohio, develop its new, “breakaway” aluminum padlock.

Hercules Industries,
Scientific Forming Technologies Corp.

Simulation results helped padlock manufacturer Hercules Industries, Prospect, Ohio, develop its new “breakaway” aluminum padlock. Unlike a typical keyed lock, the device was intended for one-time use only. Users would torque-down the bolt on the front of the lock until the head sheared off at a recessed diameter, resulting in a permanent closure. Engineers from Scientific Forming Technologies Corp., Columbus, Ohio, analyzed the lock’s pull strength using the company’s Deform 3D simulation software, in collaboration with the development staff at Hercules.

After building the padlock model, engineers rotated the virtual bolt inward until its tip fully engaged with the shackle. They then performed virtual pull tests to determine the device’s mode of failure. Initially, engineers thought the bolt tip could deform and let the shackle dislodge. Or, the shackle might unbend and let its free end pull out of the lock body. Because each possibility seemed feasible, engineers modeled the bolt and the shackle as 3D plastic objects. A fixed boundary condition was applied to the bottom of the lock body.

Engineers analyzed pull strength by assigning a constant upward velocity to a rigid object placed inside the shackle. They also accounted for the contact between the bolt and the shackle, as well as between the shackle and body. Engineers performed a multitude of tests, simulating locks made of common aluminum alloys with shackles, bolts, and bodies that had undergone different heat treatments. They modeled 5 and 6-mm shackle diameters to determine the effect of diameter on pull strength.Results showed that both the bolt and the shackle deformed. At the start of the virtual pull test, the tip of the bolt plastically deformed. As the test continued, the bolt then remained structurally sound while the shackle started to unbend. This process continued until the shackle pulled free from the lock base.

The bending of the shackle was the primary mode of failure in the simulated pull tests, which matched prototype tests at Hercules. When using the same diameter shackle, the lock made from 6061 aluminum had a higher pull strength than the lock made from 6062. Of course, excessive strength in the shackle prevents the bolt from dimpling the shackle, resulting in a lower pull strength with a failure mode where the bolt tip shears off.  While these results might seem intuitive, Deform provided solid guidance throughout an accelerated development cycle. The final design decision was based on cost, simplicity, and pull strength.

© 2010 Penton Media, Inc.

Sponsored Recommendations

From concept to consumption: Optimizing success in food and beverage

April 9, 2024
Identifying opportunities and solutions for plant floor optimization has never been easier. Download our visual guide to quickly and efficiently pinpoint areas for operational...

A closer look at modern design considerations for food and beverage

April 9, 2024
With new and changing safety and hygiene regulations at top of mind, its easy to understand how other crucial aspects of machine design can get pushed aside. Our whitepaper explores...

Cybersecurity and the Medical Manufacturing Industry

April 9, 2024
Learn about medical manufacturing cybersecurity risks, costs, and threats as well as effective cybersecurity strategies and essential solutions.

Condition Monitoring for Energy and Utilities Assets

April 9, 2024
Condition monitoring is an essential element of asset management in the energy and utilities industry. The American oil and gas, water and wastewater, and electrical grid sectors...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!