Orange More Important Than Green

March 25, 2008
Ralph Grabowski writes a great free e-newsletter on CAD which I subscribe to. His latest issue has an interesting observation on CAD companies and the green movement, which I have reproduced here. You can get his newsletter atr www.upfontezine.com ...

Ralph Grabowski writes a great free e-newsletter on CAD which I subscribe to. His latest issue has an interesting observation on CAD companies and the green movement, which I have reproduced here. You can get his newsletter atr www.upfontezine.com

. . . . .

Green is the marketing buzzword currently adopted by some CAD vendors. Earlier this month, one told me that they are also "going green." Why now? So that they wouldn't be seen as the last ones getting on the bandwagon. "Do you get a lot of feedback from your readers about green?" they asked me.

Zip.

The only reason some people might care about green, I explained, is to make money from it. Or to save money. Otherwise, it's a non-issue for most of the population.

(We got a new washing machine last week. It is energy efficient. Compared to the old one whose transmission broke down, the new one will pay for itself in less than 12 years through lower electrical, natural gas, and water bills. I'm excited.)

If green is unimportant to most people, then what is? To learn the answer, fly over your city, any city, late at night -- after doubling the cost of your airfare by paying carbon-offsets to someone to run an organization that might pay someone else to plant some trees that you can't be bothered planting yourself.

...all those streetlights illuminating sparsely-traveled roads. (When I see the thousands, millions of streetlight bulbs glowing orange, it makes me want to become a lightbulb manufacturer.) There is your answer: Security is more important than green.

Bruce Schneier writes: "The lack of a security mindset explains a lot of bad security out there: voting machines, electronic payment cards, medical devices, ID cards, internet protocols. The designers are so busy making these systems work that they don't stop to notice how they might fail or be made to fail, and then how those failures might be exploited."

The Autodesks, Dassaults, UGSs, and PTCs could consider adding security design assistants to their software. I wonder how hard that might be, because security involves thinking wrong in order to get it right.

Link: Inside the Twisted Mind of the Security Professional http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2008/03/securitymatters_0320

About the Author

Lee Teschler | Editor

Leland was Editor-in-Chief of Machine Design. He has 34 years of Service and holds a B.S. Engineering from the University of Michigan, a B.S. Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan;, and a MBA from Cleveland State University. Prior to joining Penton, Lee worked as a Communications design engineer for the U.S. Government.

Sponsored Recommendations

June 27, 2025
Ensure workplace safety and compliance with our comprehensive Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) Safety Training course. Learn critical procedures to prevent serious injuries.
June 27, 2025
Join our expert webinar to discover essential safety control measures and best practices for engineering a truly safe and compliant industrial environment.
June 25, 2025
An innovative aircraft with electric drives combines the best of both worlds. The cross between drone and helicopter could mean significantly faster and more efficient air emergency...
June 25, 2025
Effective when other materials fail, ceramics are particularly suitable for applications requiring wear and chemical resistance, sliding characteristics or biocompatibility. Discover...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!