Survey results: Manufacturers tell how they implement change

Sept. 3, 2013
Tech-Clarity surveyed dozens of manufacturers that excel at implementing factory change — manufacturers that meet project due dates, meet budgets, and meet target production volumes. Here are the results.

Let's face it, changing manufacturing processes causes disruption and headaches, and few people like change. If you asked engineers and plant staff in a factory about it they might say, "Change is hard" or "The only constant around here is change" or even, "Everything would be so much better around here if things would just stand still for a little while.”

But agility is critical to competing in a competitive marketplace, so manufacturer must master change management so they can adapt their factories quickly, efficiently, and with confidence.

How do leading manufacturers do it?  Independent research firm Tech-Clarity surveyed more manufacturers (from more than 250 identified) that excel at implementing factory change — manufacturers that meet project due dates, meet budgets, and meet target production volumes. These top performers also get changes implemented faster, even if the changes are more involved.

According to the survey, top performers:

• Better understand the full scope and impact of change in advance to avoid late surprises

• Communicate, collaborate, and share information to work as a team more effectively

• Adhere to more formal change management processes

The report — Tech-Clarity Perspective: Best Practices for Factory Adaptability — details the the challenges faced in implementing change and the business impacts of change. The research also shares the processes and software that some top performers say they use to be more agile.

What I find interesting about the results is that improving quality is the biggest driver of change — not boosting throughput (which would've been my guess). Perhaps even more surprising is that top-performing manufacturers said they implemented six to 11 small changes a year, and one to two major changes — those involving "significant change to equipment, procedures, or production lines." That's far more change than I would've guessed.

So tell us how your organization compares.  Do you see a lot of change in your workplace?  How is it managed?   Who takes responsibility for making sure new procedures get executed? Drop me a line below.

Sponsored Recommendations

From concept to consumption: Optimizing success in food and beverage

April 9, 2024
Identifying opportunities and solutions for plant floor optimization has never been easier. Download our visual guide to quickly and efficiently pinpoint areas for operational...

A closer look at modern design considerations for food and beverage

April 9, 2024
With new and changing safety and hygiene regulations at top of mind, its easy to understand how other crucial aspects of machine design can get pushed aside. Our whitepaper explores...

Cybersecurity and the Medical Manufacturing Industry

April 9, 2024
Learn about medical manufacturing cybersecurity risks, costs, and threats as well as effective cybersecurity strategies and essential solutions.

Condition Monitoring for Energy and Utilities Assets

April 9, 2024
Condition monitoring is an essential element of asset management in the energy and utilities industry. The American oil and gas, water and wastewater, and electrical grid sectors...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!