Survey results: Manufacturers tell how they implement change

Sept. 3, 2013
Tech-Clarity surveyed dozens of manufacturers that excel at implementing factory change — manufacturers that meet project due dates, meet budgets, and meet target production volumes. Here are the results.

Let's face it, changing manufacturing processes causes disruption and headaches, and few people like change. If you asked engineers and plant staff in a factory about it they might say, "Change is hard" or "The only constant around here is change" or even, "Everything would be so much better around here if things would just stand still for a little while.”

But agility is critical to competing in a competitive marketplace, so manufacturer must master change management so they can adapt their factories quickly, efficiently, and with confidence.

How do leading manufacturers do it?  Independent research firm Tech-Clarity surveyed more manufacturers (from more than 250 identified) that excel at implementing factory change — manufacturers that meet project due dates, meet budgets, and meet target production volumes. These top performers also get changes implemented faster, even if the changes are more involved.

According to the survey, top performers:

• Better understand the full scope and impact of change in advance to avoid late surprises

• Communicate, collaborate, and share information to work as a team more effectively

• Adhere to more formal change management processes

The report — Tech-Clarity Perspective: Best Practices for Factory Adaptability — details the the challenges faced in implementing change and the business impacts of change. The research also shares the processes and software that some top performers say they use to be more agile.

What I find interesting about the results is that improving quality is the biggest driver of change — not boosting throughput (which would've been my guess). Perhaps even more surprising is that top-performing manufacturers said they implemented six to 11 small changes a year, and one to two major changes — those involving "significant change to equipment, procedures, or production lines." That's far more change than I would've guessed.

So tell us how your organization compares.  Do you see a lot of change in your workplace?  How is it managed?   Who takes responsibility for making sure new procedures get executed? Drop me a line below.

About the Author

Elisabeth Eitel Blog

Elisabeth is Senior Editor of Machine Design magazine. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Fenn College at Cleveland State University. Over the last decade, Elisabeth has worked as a technical writer — most recently as Chief Editor of Motion System Design magazine.

Sponsored Recommendations

How to Build Better Robotics with Integrated Actuators

July 17, 2024
Reese Abouelnasr, a Mechatronics Engineer with Harmonic Drive, answers a few questions about the latest developments in actuators and the design or engineering challenges these...

Crisis averted: How our AI-powered services helped prevent a factory fire

July 10, 2024
Discover how Schneider Electric's services helped a food and beverage manufacturer avoid a factory fire with AI-powered analytics.

Pumps Push the Boundaries of Low Temperature Technology

June 14, 2024
As an integral part of cryotechnology, KNF pumps facilitate scientific advances in cryostats, allowing them to push temperature boundaries and approach absolute zero.

The entire spectrum of drive technology

June 5, 2024
Read exciting stories about all aspects of maxon drive technology in our magazine.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!